Created By Stephen Tuffery
www.stephengraphics.com
Terms of Use Statement Privacy Policy Purchase Agreement
DISCLAIMER: The information on this site is not intended to act as a substitute for
medical advice provided by a qualified health care provider, nor is any information
on this site intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. If anyone
has a specific health issue they should always seek medical advice.
FTC Disclosure:
If you decide to purchase any products recommended on this site I may possibly receive
some commission.
By Dr Peter Dingle and Toni Brown
Please note this site may not display properly in the AOL browser
Bio-
“The more clearly we can focus our attention on the wonders and realities of
the
universe about us, the less taste we shall have for destruction.”
Rachel Carson ©
1954
SILENT SPRING CLICK HERE TO BUY YOUR COPY
Disturbed by the reckless use of synthetic chemical pesticides after World War II,
Rachel Carson reluctantly changed her focus in order to warn the public about the
long-
In Silent Spring (1962) she challenged
the practices of agricultural scientists and the US Government, and called for a
change in the way humankind viewed the natural world.
Carson was attacked by the chemical industry and some in government, as an alarmist, but courageously spoke out to remind us that we are a vulnerable part of the natural world, subject to the same damage as the rest of the ecosystem.
Testifying before Congress in 1963, Carson called for new policies to protect human health and the environment.
Rachel Carson died in 1964 after a long battle against breast cancer. Her legacy for the beauty and integrity of life continues to inspire new generations to protect the living world and all its creatures.
Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, which in 1962 exposed the hazards of the pesticide DDD, eloquently questioned humanity’s faith in technological progress and helped set the stage for the environmental movement.
Anyone reading Silent Spring will be moved by Carson’s revelation of the deadly effects
of exposure to seemingly harmless synthetic chemicals through bio-
1. Bio-
2. Bio-
3. Bio-
While pesticides (“-
Over the past 40 years many scientific studies have verified Carson’s findings regarding the adverse effects of agricultural synthetic chemicals, including those used on plants for medicinal and cosmetic purposes, which led to known carcinogens such as DDT, Dieldrin and a host of others being banned. The unfortunate thing is that it took decades (up to the 1990s for some) for this to happen.
One of Carson's most important discoveries was what is known today as biomagnification. An example of this process is the case of Clear Lake, California.
In order to “control” an insect called a gnat (a relative of the mosquito) at Clear Lake, north of San Francisco, the authorities used the chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticide dichloro diphenyl dichloroethane (DDD – a relative of DDT), in a diluted form of one part DDD to 70 million parts water.
At first the gnats were brought under control, but soon their numbers increased. So the authorities again sprayed one part DDD to 50 million parts water.
In the winter after the first treatment, many hundreds of birds were discovered dead. And again, in the winter following the second treatment, many more birds were found dead. After examination of the fatty tissue of the birds, extraordinarily high levels of DDD were found, much higher than was ever put into the water.
Researchers realised that the chemical had been taken in by the smallest life form,
concentrated and then passed on to the next life form until its concentrations reached
the phenomenal levels found in the birds.
No trace of DDD was found in the water. Why? Did it biodegrade? No! It had been absorbed
into the bodies of life that the lake supported.
Worse still, the poison had been
passed up the food chain. That is why we still find these chemicals in our food today,
particularly in root vegetables and fish.
After 23 months, the plankton from the
lake still had the chemicals in it. All the birds, fish and frogs examined also had
the chemical in them.
DDD was added to the water in very low concentrations (0.02ppm), yet it was found
that plankton organisms were found to contain 5ppm, a multiplication (biomagnification)
of 250. Plant-
It has been established since this original work that some compounds can bio-
Bio-
Understanding this concept is very important in protecting us from the adverse effects
of synthetic chemical exposure. The sad truth is that when we introduce synthetic
chemicals into our environment, it takes many years for us to “discover” what really
happens.
Top of Form 1
This is not a scientific approach that benefits society, but a science that uses society for profit and experimentation. Given the recent introduction of GMOs (genetically modified organisms) into the agricultural supply chain,
Carson’s book is just as relevant today as when it was written in 1962.
